These 9 categories identify the source of fire and who is responsible for the killings. This
allows us to understand which groups or individuals have targeted journalists over the years.
The timeline, from 1992 to 2025, shows the year each killing occurred, making it
possible to observe how incidents are distributed over time and to identify any peaks or trends.
Each dot on the chart represents 1 journalist. At any moment,
you can pause to explore a story by clicking on it.
Silence will not have
the last word.
the last word.
In the recent decades, the number of journalists killed worldwide has become an alarming indicator of
press freedom. CPJ data show that reporters and media workers continue to lose
their lives, especially in contexts of conflict, political instability, or organized crime.
Analyzing peaks of these violent events helps to better understand the dynamics
threatening freedom of information and to identify the most affected periods and regions.
Maguindanao Massacre (Philippines)
Period: 2009
Total recorded victims: 32
Total recorded victims: 32
A single event illustrates the danger posed by political clans. A convoy of journalists
was attacked, and 32 media workers were brutally executed by men
connected to government officials, marking one of the deadliest attacks on the press in history.
Palestinian Occupation
Period: 1948-2025
Total recorded victims: 216
Total recorded victims: 216
Journalists investigating corruption and trafficking are systematically silenced. Violence among
cartels peaked at 75 murders in 2023 due to operations and attacks carried
out by military forces.
Iraq War
Period: 2003-2011
Total recorded victims: 286
Total recorded victims: 286
Post-invasion instability turned the country into a deadly trap among government forces, militias,
and jihadist groups. Violence peaked in 2006 with 55 killings, mostly
perpetrated by armed political groups.
The Massacre Without Perpetrators
The most dramatic data does not concern a single conflict, but a set of cases united by one key
element: the absence of identified responsibility.
In total, there are 188 victims. Different stories, same outcome: no confirmed perpetrator. Not always due to lack of information, but often because the available details are insufficient to provide a definitive answer.
In total, there are 188 victims. Different stories, same outcome: no confirmed perpetrator. Not always due to lack of information, but often because the available details are insufficient to provide a definitive answer.
Uncertain
Here the truth is suspended in doubt. Responsibility could lie
with different actors without it being possible to identify one for certain. Too many
versions, no official truth. And when the truth is “uncertain,” so is justice.
Unknown
Here the situation is even clearer: the perpetrator has not been identified. Each
dot represents a victim with no known perpetrator. The data counts the cases but
also highlights a gap: a crime without an official culprit.
Explore the Data by Country
The overall view shows major trends but hides key differences. Observing the data country by
country allows us to understand how violence changes depending on context: where
it rises, where it falls, who is most involved, and the number of victims in each country.
This perspective helps move from aggregate data to individual realities, highlighting responsibilities and dynamics that would otherwise remain indistinct.
This perspective helps move from aggregate data to individual realities, highlighting responsibilities and dynamics that would otherwise remain indistinct.
Number of victims
0
Click the button to explore
another visualization
IMPUNITY STATUS
another visualization